Glenn Reynolds: For true equality, prohibit the college box

Posted on 11 june 2016 by Admin   •   Filed under Medical AdvisorComments 11

Some studies recommend that the ban the box technique does more harm than good since it doesn’t enable candidates with clean records to let employers know about that. However, if you truly wish to promote equality on job applications, then there’s another box that we must be banning: The one about education.

College is sold as a source of social mobility because getting an education enhances your chance of getting a task. However, there’s another way of looking at things: College isn’t a lot a source of movement as the lack of college is a barrier to going up, a barrier that disproportionately impacts the bad.

Four years of college, even in-state at a public university, can easily cost $100,000 and lots of students take 5 or six years to finish, not four. Far, a lot of efforts to fix this have focused on making college cheaper or providing students more financial aid.

Even if tuition is complimentary, other expenditures are big. And even if students get a full-ride scholarship tuition and costs it’s a big commitment of time and a major problem on those who have to support or care for children, parents or other liked ones. Simply put, if you have to go to college to move up in the world, a great deal of people isn’t going to go up.

Worse yet, naturally, all colleges are not developed equal. Individuals who participated in Ivy League schools have a huge work benefit over individuals who didn’t, even if they drifted through without learning anything (which, given grade inflation these days, is really possible). Simply the sight of Harvard or Columbia on a job application may provide the candidate an unreasonable boost over others.

So if you desire equality, the best thing to do is to ban employers from asking students where they went to school and, possibly, even if they went to college at all.

This may appear ridiculous to some readers, but the reality is that higher education, and specifically elite higher education, is most likely the single greatest perpetuator of advantage in our society. Americans sport college stickers on their vehicles and encourage their kids to sweat those college essays for a reason. (The old joke is, you can constantly inform a Harvard male, and if you can’t, don t concerns because he’ll inform you within 90 seconds).

Without relying on colleges as a foundation for credentials, we’d have to discover some other method to assess prospects. These kinds of credentials would be much faster and easier to get and less tied to pre-existing opportunity than college degrees are now, and less most likely to promote old-boy (or -woman) networks that freeze out newcomers.

So if we re major about promoting equality and eliminating barriers that keep the less fortunate from getting ahead, let s ban the box: The college box.